Skip to Main Content

Systematic Reviews and Evidence Based Practice: Scoping review

Scoping Review

  • Identifies the size and nature of the evidence base for a particular topic area- a preliminary assessment or preparatory process.
  • Differs from a systematic review in that a synthesis of the literature is not usually undertaken.
  • Usually undertaken to assess the feasibility of conducting a Systematic Review or to identify the nature of evidence.
  • Not appropriate to answer a clinical question.
  • Scoping reviews are therefore particularly useful when a body of literature has not yet been comprehensively reviewed.
  • Scoping reviews are exploratory, and they typically address a broad question.
  • Researchers conduct them to assess the extent of the available evidence, to organise it into groups and to highlight gaps in the research.