| Essay with in-text citations |
A recent study shows a correlation between engagement with the academic library’s support and retention (Delaney 2019). According to Atkinson (2015, 2020), the correlation is fundamental to development of the Library’s strategy. The key recommendations of this study include development of video support. These recommendations were further examined by the User Services Team (Campbell 2017). Campbell (2017) proposes synchronous and asynchronous sessions, would increase engagement, and alleviate research stress. McCoo and McGill (2019) further suggest that audio captioning and transcription would provide improved accessibility. The correlation between engagement with the academic library’s support and retention should be developed to facilitate widening participation (Campbell 2017; Atkinson 2020). McGill et al. (2021) support this view and illustrate accessibility issues involved. McCoo and McGill (2019) further suggest that audio captioning and transcription would improve accessibility.
| References: |
Atkinson, J. (2015) Students and the Library. New Review of Libraries, 2(4), 12-15.
Atkinson, J. (2020) Fundamentals of something and something else. 2nd ed. Harlow: Learning Matters.
Campbell, M. (2017) Challenges in something. New Review of Something, 15(1), 15-24.
Delaney, G. (2019) Critical approaches to something. New York: Pearson.
McCoo, K. and McGill, C. (2019) Demystifying something. 3rd ed. London: Sage.
McGill, C., Delaney, G. and Atkinson, J. (2021) Reimaging library services. New Review of Academic Writing, 5(9), 52-63.
| Points to note |
|---|
Points to note:
Braidwood, B. (2021a) Helping students reference. Journal of Academic Studies, 17(1), 12-15.
Braidwood, B. (2021b) Enabling students to study. 4th ed. London: SAGE.